Helpful Fantasy Sites?

[Baron]

<!--quoteo(post=113900:date=Sep 9 2010, 10:25 PM:name=PcB)-->QUOTE (PcB @ Sep 9 2010, 10:25 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=113895:date=Sep 9 2010, 10:22 PM:name=Baron)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Baron @ Sep 9 2010, 10:22 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=113894:date=Sep 9 2010, 10:20 PM:name=PcB)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (PcB @ Sep 9 2010, 10:20 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=113889:date=Sep 9 2010, 09:10 PM:name=Baron)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Baron @ Sep 9 2010, 09:10 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec-->Tim Hightower @STL
Johnathan Stewart @NYG
Felix Jones @WAS
Donovan McNabb vs DAL

I need one RB and one flex, standard settings, I'm leaning to McNabb and Hightower I think.

My WR are weak, my backups are Devin Hester, Devin Thomas and Steve Breaston.

Here are the top projected FA WR: Danny Amendola (we get 1 pt every 50 return yds), Mike Thomas (JAX), Gaffney (DEN), Bess (MIA), Mike Williams (TB), Jenkins (ATL) and so on... any WR sleepers out there for me? lol<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
What kind of retarded ass league lets you play a QB as a flex option? That's some of the dumbest shit I've ever heard of. Why not just start 2 QB's instead of having a flex?
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
It had been 2 QBs for the last 4 years but people bitched about QB hoarding and having to trade quality for shitty QBs. I don't like it much, and I'll always play a QB there, but I liked 2 QBs because it made our league seem unique.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
But it's exactly the same thing. EVERYONE is going to play a QB as the flex, and if they don't they're dumb. Playing 2 QB's just makes it sound less stupid, but it's the same thing.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->

I don't disagree.