11-01-2009, 02:08 PM
<!--quoteo(post=67795:date=Nov 1 2009, 07:13 AM:name=1060Ivy)-->QUOTE (1060Ivy @ Nov 1 2009, 07:13 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=67793:date=Nov 1 2009, 04:16 AM:name=KBwsb)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (KBwsb @ Nov 1 2009, 04:16 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE <!--quotec-->CHICAGO -- Although the Cubs have had discussions with Toronto about different scenarios, Cubs sources on Saturday vehemently denied that there is any type of a trade for Milton Bradley for Vernon Wells being discussed.
Bradley had two years left on his contract at $21.5 million. Wells has five years left at $98 million, including $23 million each in the last two years of the contract.
More realistic opportunities to trade Bradley still exist in Tampa, with a possible trade for Pat Burrell, or possible scenarios with the Texas Rangers or the Los Angeles Angels of Anaheim.
<b>Gary Matthews Jr. of the Angels is a name which has been speculated about in media reports over the last couple of day</b><b>s</b>.<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
If a Mathews for Bradley deal ever goes through, I think it'd be bad for the Cubs.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Does Sarge Jr deal come with his own supply for HGH?
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
The problems with Matthews is he's old and can't hit. He can still field CF and would allow us to move Fukudome over to RF, but we'd have to make sure to pick up someone else who can hit to pick up the slack. I'm not sure that makes much sense.
Bradley had two years left on his contract at $21.5 million. Wells has five years left at $98 million, including $23 million each in the last two years of the contract.
More realistic opportunities to trade Bradley still exist in Tampa, with a possible trade for Pat Burrell, or possible scenarios with the Texas Rangers or the Los Angeles Angels of Anaheim.
<b>Gary Matthews Jr. of the Angels is a name which has been speculated about in media reports over the last couple of day</b><b>s</b>.<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
If a Mathews for Bradley deal ever goes through, I think it'd be bad for the Cubs.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Does Sarge Jr deal come with his own supply for HGH?
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
The problems with Matthews is he's old and can't hit. He can still field CF and would allow us to move Fukudome over to RF, but we'd have to make sure to pick up someone else who can hit to pick up the slack. I'm not sure that makes much sense.
I got nothin'.
Andy
Andy