![]() |
Baseball America's all-rookie team - Printable Version +- Sons of Ivy (https://sonsofivy.com/forum) +-- Forum: Chicago Cubs (https://sonsofivy.com/forum/forum-4.html) +--- Forum: The Friendly Confines (https://sonsofivy.com/forum/forum-8.html) +--- Thread: Baseball America's all-rookie team (/thread-6153.html) |
Baseball America's all-rookie team - Scarey - 10-28-2009 I know a lot of you guys have very little faith in Wells, but even you have to agree that Wells got shafted on this one. BA's All-Rookie Team Not quite sure how they make their selections, but if performance from this year has a strong bearing, Wells really should have been on there. Baseball America's all-rookie team - jeffy - 10-28-2009 hmmmmm, I'm surprised the "team" doesn't have more pitchers anyway. Baseball America's all-rookie team - veryzer - 10-28-2009 *shrug* all those guys deserved it. Baseball America's all-rookie team - Runnys - 10-28-2009 <!--quoteo(post=67440:date=Oct 28 2009, 02:13 PM:name=veryzer)-->QUOTE (veryzer @ Oct 28 2009, 02:13 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec-->*shrug* all those guys deserved it.<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd--> That is what I was thinking. You could easily make a case for all of those guys over Wells. You could also make a case for Wells over some of them. I hardly think he got shafted though. Baseball America's all-rookie team - Andy - 10-28-2009 <!--quoteo(post=67438:date=Oct 28 2009, 01:54 PM:name=Scarey)-->QUOTE (Scarey @ Oct 28 2009, 01:54 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec-->I know a lot of you guys have very little faith in Wells, but even you have to agree that Wells got shafted on this one. BA's All-Rookie Team Not quite sure how they make their selections, but if performance from this year has a strong bearing, Wells really should have been on there.<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd--> [sarcasm]As we all know, the W/L record is the most telling stat for a picther.[/sarcasm] His 12-10 record doesn't look as nice. Baseball America's all-rookie team - Scarey - 10-28-2009 <!--quoteo(post=67442:date=Oct 28 2009, 02:18 PM:name=Runnys)-->QUOTE (Runnys @ Oct 28 2009, 02:18 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=67440:date=Oct 28 2009, 02:13 PM:name=veryzer)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (veryzer @ Oct 28 2009, 02:13 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec-->*shrug* all those guys deserved it.<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd--> That is what I was thinking. You could easily make a case for all of those guys over Wells. You could also make a case for Wells over some of them. I hardly think he got shafted though. <!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd--> I know ERA doesn't translate equally from AL to NL, but Nieman's and Porcello's ERAs don't look as impressive to me as Well's 3.05 in the NL. If Wells had a 3.40 or 3.5 ERA, I wouldn't mind as much. Baseball America's all-rookie team - Runnys - 10-28-2009 Porcello got in because he put up those stats while being the youngest pitcher in the game. At least I think he is the youngest in the game. Baseball America's all-rookie team - Scarey - 10-28-2009 Here's another guy that should have made it. Brad Bergeson Baseball America's all-rookie team - Ace - 10-28-2009 Absolute bullshit. No freaking way Niemann and Porcello deserved it over Wells. That's utter crap. Baseball America's all-rookie team - Scarey - 10-28-2009 <!--quoteo(post=67462:date=Oct 28 2009, 05:30 PM:name=Ace)-->QUOTE (Ace @ Oct 28 2009, 05:30 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec-->Absolute bullshit. No freaking way Niemann and Porcello deserved it over Wells. That's utter crap.<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd--> Do I sense a hint of hyperbole? |