Sons of Ivy
Baseball America's all-rookie team - Printable Version

+- Sons of Ivy (https://sonsofivy.com/forum)
+-- Forum: Chicago Cubs (https://sonsofivy.com/forum/forum-4.html)
+--- Forum: The Friendly Confines (https://sonsofivy.com/forum/forum-8.html)
+--- Thread: Baseball America's all-rookie team (/thread-6153.html)



Baseball America's all-rookie team - Scarey - 10-28-2009

I know a lot of you guys have very little faith in Wells, but even you have to agree that Wells got shafted on this one.

BA's All-Rookie Team

Not quite sure how they make their selections, but if performance from this year has a strong bearing, Wells really should have been on there.


Baseball America's all-rookie team - jeffy - 10-28-2009

hmmmmm, I'm surprised the "team" doesn't have more pitchers anyway.


Baseball America's all-rookie team - veryzer - 10-28-2009

*shrug*

all those guys deserved it.


Baseball America's all-rookie team - Runnys - 10-28-2009

<!--quoteo(post=67440:date=Oct 28 2009, 02:13 PM:name=veryzer)-->QUOTE (veryzer @ Oct 28 2009, 02:13 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec-->*shrug*

all those guys deserved it.<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->


That is what I was thinking. You could easily make a case for all of those guys over Wells. You could also make a case for Wells over some of them. I hardly think he got shafted though.


Baseball America's all-rookie team - Andy - 10-28-2009

<!--quoteo(post=67438:date=Oct 28 2009, 01:54 PM:name=Scarey)-->QUOTE (Scarey @ Oct 28 2009, 01:54 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec-->I know a lot of you guys have very little faith in Wells, but even you have to agree that Wells got shafted on this one.

BA's All-Rookie Team

Not quite sure how they make their selections, but if performance from this year has a strong bearing, Wells really should have been on there.<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->

[sarcasm]As we all know, the W/L record is the most telling stat for a picther.[/sarcasm]

His 12-10 record doesn't look as nice.


Baseball America's all-rookie team - Scarey - 10-28-2009

<!--quoteo(post=67442:date=Oct 28 2009, 02:18 PM:name=Runnys)-->QUOTE (Runnys @ Oct 28 2009, 02:18 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=67440:date=Oct 28 2009, 02:13 PM:name=veryzer)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (veryzer @ Oct 28 2009, 02:13 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec-->*shrug*

all those guys deserved it.<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->


That is what I was thinking. You could easily make a case for all of those guys over Wells. You could also make a case for Wells over some of them. I hardly think he got shafted though.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->


I know ERA doesn't translate equally from AL to NL, but Nieman's and Porcello's ERAs don't look as impressive to me as Well's 3.05 in the NL. If Wells had a 3.40 or 3.5 ERA, I wouldn't mind as much.


Baseball America's all-rookie team - Runnys - 10-28-2009

Porcello got in because he put up those stats while being the youngest pitcher in the game. At least I think he is the youngest in the game.


Baseball America's all-rookie team - Scarey - 10-28-2009

Here's another guy that should have made it.

Brad Bergeson


Baseball America's all-rookie team - Ace - 10-28-2009

Absolute bullshit. No freaking way Niemann and Porcello deserved it over Wells. That's utter crap.


Baseball America's all-rookie team - Scarey - 10-28-2009

<!--quoteo(post=67462:date=Oct 28 2009, 05:30 PM:name=Ace)-->QUOTE (Ace @ Oct 28 2009, 05:30 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec-->Absolute bullshit. No freaking way Niemann and Porcello deserved it over Wells. That's utter crap.<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->

Do I sense a hint of hyperbole?