09-02-2018, 07:11 PM
I feel like it's part of the fun in the pick though. Like whoever gets Saquon Barkley this year. It's supposed to be that you have control of him for a few years and that's fun.
You're also losing the first-round pick the next year, so it's not like it's an amazing, hugely advantageous thing. I've frequently passed on it because I don't like the value of that vs a keeper/worse player in a lower round, for example. This year, I had Le'Veon Bell, so I'd be dumb to not keep him... but it's entirely possible several of the other first-rounders end up being better.
I'm fine with whatever going forward. But I feel like if that's going to be a new addition, everyone else should be informed or else it really hurts the purpose of getting a Saquon Barkley or Royce Freeman if anyone wanted to in the first round.
You're also losing the first-round pick the next year, so it's not like it's an amazing, hugely advantageous thing. I've frequently passed on it because I don't like the value of that vs a keeper/worse player in a lower round, for example. This year, I had Le'Veon Bell, so I'd be dumb to not keep him... but it's entirely possible several of the other first-rounders end up being better.
I'm fine with whatever going forward. But I feel like if that's going to be a new addition, everyone else should be informed or else it really hurts the purpose of getting a Saquon Barkley or Royce Freeman if anyone wanted to in the first round.
@TheBlogfines