09-01-2016, 11:02 PM
Correct. But the point is that there should have been a rule closing this loophole (deadline or otherwise), and there's an opportunity to correct that.
If you were being harmed in some way other than not being allowed to keep the player who, the point is that you should have been able to try and keep in the first place, that would be significant. But that's not the case. You're no worse off than if the loophole hadn't existed.
If you were being harmed in some way other than not being allowed to keep the player who, the point is that you should have been able to try and keep in the first place, that would be significant. But that's not the case. You're no worse off than if the loophole hadn't existed.
This is not some silly theory that's unsupported and deserves being mocked by photos of Xena. ![[Image: ITgoyeg.png]](http://i.imgur.com/ITgoyeg.png)